This article is just another piece of strong evidence for my theory that the only way to "close the gap" between kids from poverty and kids from money is boarding school. In the second half of this post I wrote about the real solution to this problem. Seriously.
The Star Tribune article dances around the truth - poor city kids do better around better role models AND poor city kids don't have the skills/attitudes AND opportunity to stick with it long enough to succeed.
The culture in the inner city is this pervasive scourge of ignorance and instant gratification. This combined with high rates of student mobility and an unstable homelife makes the situation impossible. These kids MUST be taken out of the environment if this thing is ever to turn around. Read the articles (both of them) and think about it. The answer is obvious, and expensive....or not. Is it really expensive if we put a big dent in the cycle of poverty?
Stuff to think about, to be sure.
The Star Tribune article dances around the truth - poor city kids do better around better role models AND poor city kids don't have the skills/attitudes AND opportunity to stick with it long enough to succeed.
The culture in the inner city is this pervasive scourge of ignorance and instant gratification. This combined with high rates of student mobility and an unstable homelife makes the situation impossible. These kids MUST be taken out of the environment if this thing is ever to turn around. Read the articles (both of them) and think about it. The answer is obvious, and expensive....or not. Is it really expensive if we put a big dent in the cycle of poverty?
Stuff to think about, to be sure.

